In a critique session, which approach supports ongoing improvement?

• A. Provide positive feedback first.
• B. Start with negative feedback.
• C. Delay feedback until later.
• D. Deliver feedback only in writing.

Answer: (A)

Starting a critique by acknowledging what went well creates a constructive learning environment that invites growth. When you open with positive feedback, you validate the learner’s efforts, reinforce effective practices, and build trust. That sense of recognition makes the learner more receptive to the subsequent, specific suggestions for improvement, because they see a clear path forward rather than just criticism. After noting strengths, provide actionable, concrete steps for improvement so the learner knows exactly what to adjust and how to do it next time. Ending with encouragement helps sustain motivation and confidence to apply the feedback.

Choosing to lead with negative feedback can trigger defensiveness and make it harder to hear the areas that need change. Delaying feedback slows improvement because the cues and guidance aren’t available when they’re most useful. Delivering feedback only in writing removes the opportunity for immediate dialogue, clarification, and joint problem-solving.